Support, support, support
Have you noticed that some postings and news sites that are most outspoken are the least well-documented? I was thinking about my tendency to shoot off my mouth and decided to do something about it.
For instance when I referred to a conversation between two people that indicates one of them is a weasel, I linked to the site that carries a first person narrative. Next, I referred to a well-documented event where the weasel said something obviously ignorant.
It served to make a point. The person in question has questionable motives. Period. It casts doubt on everything he says from the original statement forward to today.
I think that's a good thing because it cuts down on objections from supporters who are tied to the weasel. They are forced to address the issue within themselves if I write clearly.